Two bidders for Chelsea planning to stay at Stamford Bridge a huge bonus – Talk Chelsea

I wouldn’t say it might be the be all and finish all when trying on the completely different potential bidders to by Chelsea and the actions they are going to be making, however for me, staying at Stamford Bridge is up there as one of many priorities.

The stadium wants redeveloping, I don’t doubt that. We have to improve the capability to have the ability to deliver in additional income and proceed competing with the highest golf equipment on the earth.

However we don’t need to A) transfer and construct a brand new stadium, or B) transfer away from Stamford Bridge for a couple of years while Stamford Bridge is constructed up.

We’d not must do both of those if at the moment’s report from The Telegraph is to be believed. As a result of they declare that two bidders, Todd Boehly’s consortium, and the consortium led by Sir Martin Broughton, have proposed their stadium redevelopment plans to contain staying at Stamford Bridge and build up as we go, somewhat than briefly relocating to Wembley to play our house matches, like Spurs needed to do just lately.

Chelsea bidders discover Anfield-style redevelopment of Stamford Bridge (telegraph.co.uktelegraph.co.uk)

This for me, is an enormous bonus and makes these two consortiums, or any consortium planning on doing the identical, extra beneficial. I feel it’s so essential staying at The Bridge. It’s our house, it’s nearer for a lot of match-goers, and shifting away from it might simply not sit proper with me, nor would it not with many different followers.

I feel that is constructive information at the moment from two of the ultimate 4 shortlisted teams to purchase our membership, and I don’t even consider that that is one thing you possibly can simply say for PR both. I really feel they must totally imply this pledge.