[ad_1]
Benfica have rejected an enormous €100 million supply from Liverpool for midfielder and Manchester United goal Enzo Fernandez, in keeping with studies from Portugal.
The 21 yr previous has loved a improbable season to date at Benfica having joined them from River Plate in the summertime for €10 million plus €8 in bonuses.
These performances earned him a shock beginning place in Lionel Scaloni’s Argentina World Cup facet, and his performances within the Albiceleste’s profitable marketing campaign have catapulted him to changing into one of many hottest properties in soccer.
United are one of several clubs eager on capturing the attacking midfielder, however arch rivals Liverpool have been trying to swoop in shortly while others wait till the tip of the season.
Based on Correio de Manhã, the Merseysiders have lodged a whopping €100 million bid – nearly thrice the participant’s worth as per transfermarkt.com – which has been sensationally rejected.
“On Wednesday, Benfica rejected a proposal of 100 million euros for Enzo Fernández, coming from an English membership that, in keeping with Correio da Manhã, is Liverpool,” the outlet states.
“Rui Costa, president of Benfica, rejected the supply outright, as a result of he desires to offer precedence to the sports activities undertaking.
“The Eagles’ president thus maintains that no supply beneath 120 million euros will probably be admitted, as that’s the worth of the termination clause.”
It’s true that Costa promised recently that he wouldn’t enable any key participant to go away in January except his launch clause is met, a incontrovertible fact that equally applies to a different United goal, ahead Gonçalo Ramos, who additionally dazzled in Qatar.
If Liverpool actually have bid €100m for Enzo, it could seem that Costa has been true to his phrase.
Whether or not United will compete with their rivals at that form of degree in June stays to be seen.
It is usually potential, in fact, that both membership may set off the discharge clause and signal the participant now, though in United’s case that appears extremely unlikely whereas a striker stays the precedence.
[ad_2]
Source link
