[ad_1]
Spanish media reviews point out that Barcelona’s president, Joan Laporta, is at the moment beneath investigation as a part of the ‘Negreira’ case, which revolves round alleged funds to referees and bribery.
Initially, the case centered on funds between 2014 and 2018. At the moment, Sandro Rosell and Jose Maria Bartomeu served because the chief executives of Barcelona. Nonetheless, the investigation has now expanded to incorporate a interval that overlaps with Laporta‘s first time period as president from 2003 to 2010.
In March, it got here to mild that Spanish prosecutors had lodged a criticism in response to reviews that Barcelona had made funds exceeding $7.4 million to firms owned by Jose Maria Enriquez Negreira. Negreira served as the previous vice chairman of the Spanish FA’s refereeing committee. He had an affiliation with these funds from 2001 to 2018.
The current developments point out the investigation’s timeline extends again to 2008. For reference, that is the furthest level of concern beneath a 15-year statute of limitations.
Joan Laporta faces new bribery accusations
Laporta faces prices of bribery associated to sports activities corruption, illegal administration and the falsification of paperwork.
The investigation into Barcelona revolves round potential ongoing corruption allegations, as introduced by prosecutors who suspect that the membership made funds in change for actions that may favor them in matches and competitions.
Membership representatives acknowledged Barcelona made these funds in change for data reviews on referees officiating the Blaugrana’s matches. Joan Laporta, alternatively, has talked about that they have been for scouting reviews on younger gamers throughout Spain.
How did Laporta reply?
In the meantime, the present Barcelona president has reiterated his innocence within the matter.
“I perceive that there aren’t any grounds to cost me. Figuring out the historical past of this decide, I had numbers to finish up investigated. However there aren’t any grounds and there’s no bribery. There is no such thing as a persevering with offense,” Laporta instructed Catalunya Radio.
“The prosecution described it as sporting corruption however in no case bribery. The decide is forcing this complete story. An investigating decide. It’s fairly shocking. I’m very clear that each one Barcelona followers can relaxation assured that this case will find yourself being shelved.
“There are two hypotheses. We paid cash for providers. It was paid by financial institution switch and there are invoices. We introduced 629 reviews and 42 CDs. They have been helpful reviews as a result of they have been utilized by individuals who wanted to know this data. We have now proven that there have been reviews, documented with movies in some circumstances. The decide’s speculation is that we purchased referees and so they haven’t proved that. And so they gained’t have the ability to as a result of it’s not true.”
Laporta defends his case
“There’s a sociological Madridismo within the facilities of energy. There’s a whole lot of power. I’ve competed in opposition to this sociological Madridismo, and I’ve gained. They’re afraid that what occurred in my first time period will occur once more. We gained rather a lot and that damage them rather a lot. They suffered rather a lot. We’re used to combating in opposition to this. This Madridismo is within the media, on this planet of sport. We have now to simply accept this as regular however as Cules we now have to know that we now have to compete in opposition to this.
“They’re panicking that we are going to repeat what we now have already performed, that we are going to win every thing once more. The membership, which has additionally been accused of fraudulent administration, breach of belief and falsification of enterprise paperwork, proceed to insist that they merely paid for technical reviews on referees.”
PHOTO: IMAGO & ZUMA Wire
Loading…
[ad_2]
Source link
