[ad_1]
On Wednesday, Gegard Mousasi filed a lawsuit within the state of New Jersey towards Bellator, and the blended martial arts group’s new house owners at PFL.
The grievance cites breach of contract in addition to quite a few different infractions similar to “breach of the implied covenant of fine religion and honest dealing, unjust enrichment, and a declare for aid for Monopsonization.”
Mousasi signed with Bellator in 2017 after which agreed to an extension in 2020 that was later amended in 2023.
In response to report from MMA Fighting’s Damon Martin, “Below the phrases of the deal, Mousasi could be paid a ‘assured purse of $150,000 for his first 4 bouts, after which after his first 4 bouts have been accomplished, Gegard would obtain assured purse for every subsequent bout of $200,000.’
Mousasi would additionally obtain a “end bonus of $50,000 for any bouts gained by knockout or submission, plus a promotional charge for every such bout of $600,000. Accordingly, after his fourth bout was accomplished, Gegard was assured to earn $800,000 per bout, and as much as $850,000.”
Earlier this yr after voicing his concern, Mousasi was released from contract.
“The issue is we can’t get ahold of them,” Mousasi mentioned. “They refuse to reply us again. I’ve been coaching, I’ve been prepared. However like I mentioned, they don’t promote me, or individuals assume I’m retired truly. Individuals don’t even know. After my combat, Fabian Edwards fought twice, and since then, they don’t even speak to us. I do know I’ve a contract with them. I do know they’re obligated to offer me these fights. I’m simply ready and I don’t know. Simply ready, what can I do?
“I talked to Mike Kogan, he recommended, ‘Nicely, you make an excessive amount of cash.’ He mentioned, ‘I’d get again to you after I speak to them as a result of they can’t allow you to grasp like this.’ I haven’t heard from him both.”
The fighter alleges breach of contract and claims that Bellator/PFL “engaged in anti-competitive monopsony conduct” whereas claiming he was misclassified as an impartial contractor relatively than an worker.
Mousasi is in search of “compensatory, consequential and/or equitable financial damages in an quantity to be decided at trial, however not lower than $15 million” in addition to punitive damages and legal professional charges.
[ad_2]
Source link